Whisky Connosr
Menu
Buy Whisky Online

McCarthy's

Not bad, not good, price too high

0 484

RReview by @Rigmorole

17th Feb 2013

0

McCarthy's
  • Nose
    ~
  • Taste
    ~
  • Finish
    ~
  • Balance
    ~
  • Overall
    84

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: user

  • Brand: McCarthy's
  • ABV: 46%

Finally tasted a glass of McCarthy's. Available at the Highland Stillhouse. I think I will hold off from buying a bottle for $55, I think. A bit steep for what I tasted. If it was ten dollars cheaper, I would probably buy. It's just hard to spend the same money on a local curio when I could buy Caol Ila, Laphroaig QC, Talisker, or Ardbeg 10 for the same price or cheaper.

Here are my notes:

Age: Three Year

Nose: Sharp young Isla composition; a bit gamey; wet marsh meets typical Isla peat and smoke and salt.

Palette: Needs about 20 minutes to settle into a glass. Warm it in your hands to bring it to life sooner, or set it in the sunshine. Similarities to Talisker, Caol Ila. The peat and smoke does not impress until it warms, and then it gives way to fairly good composition with hints of brine and caramel.

Finish: flat and short. Unextraordinary to me. The immediate finish is enjoyable certainly, and even fun, but it fades very fast inded. When compared with the big boys from Isla and other parts of Scotland, it does not stand out particularly. It's not bad, even enjoyable, but unimpressive to me if one is judging the artistry and craftsmanship.

Last night I tasted an 18 year Talisker that was quite delicious. Having that in my recent memory did not help my appreciation for McCarthy's, even though I am a "local Portland boy" and do very much like to see scotch made here, especially with Islay characteristics. But it is what it is. I cannot fudge or put on rose colored glasses when I review a whisky. Accuracy and honesty is vital. I always say precisely what I think.

In this case, McCarthy's could be much much better with more time. It's just not old enough to be a distinguished offering. Clear Creek Distillery needs to look beyond merely selling out their product, year by year. The management needs to reach for excellence and fine craftsmanship, as it does in its other offerings.

For Chrissakes, Clear Creek distillers go to the trouble to grow fricking pears and apples INSIDE BOTTLES ON THE TREES OF ORCHARDS for some of the other offerings. Now that is dedication. So why not put aside some casks of this single malt for longer than three measly years? Why not show the same dedication?

The potential for greatness is there in McCarthy's, but the achieve of the thing has not materialized. I like the ABV level and the fact that no coloring or fake additives detract from the craftsmanship of this very young whisky. Making whisky is more than just a way to earn money. It's an artform. Let's not forget that.

Bottling year tasted? Not sure. This does make a difference. Some years are better than others. 2008 was very good indeed. This bottle that I tasted was most likely not that year. The Highland Stillhouse was quite busy; I could not get the precise year of the bottle that I tasted. I will call when it's not busy and add that below when I can.

Nose:

4 comments

Rigmorole commented

Hey, Clear Creek, why not try aging some McCarthy's batches in Quarter Casks? Three years in a QC would be interesting to taste!

11 years ago 0

@NAV26
NAV26 commented

@Rigmorole, glad you got a chance to try this as a sample. I do agree that Clear Creak may need to mix the formula up a bit if the want to make the next step up in class. Having sampled my bottle a couple of times recently, I do get some heat that I can't help but attribute to the youthfulness of the spirit. The knowledge, artistry and passion seem to be their judging from their range of spirits. I wonder what is holding them back? Perhaps they are spread to thin...

11 years ago 0

Rigmorole commented

Yes, I see your point. Good point. I think the issue with McCarthy's might just be good old fashioned profit margins. When you sell out everything you distill like hotcakes, it's hard to strive for a better product, especially one that is more expensive to make. Three years in the casks is a fast turn-around and that equals a great profit margin, I'm sure.

11 years ago 0

@NAV26
NAV26 commented

@rigmorole, I have been thinking a little bit more about some of the issues with this whisky after finishing my bottle the other day. It seems that barley quality could be a big factor as Clear Creek is importing peated barley from Scotland. Not sure what effects malting, peating and then shipping would have on quality but I am sure there would be some. Distillers such as Bruichladdich and Kilchoman have adopted a terroir attitude towards Barley in some of their expressions, using specific varietals and focusing on production techniques when farming, malting and peating. For me the quality and characteristcs of the barley seem very important to the final product. This goes back to some issues the community has discussed in the past over qualities and characteristics in the grains used for distallation. I have noticed that some of the more advanced reviewers detect and note there perception of grain quality. I am just throwing this out there as another possible factor in the difference between McCarthy's and some of the Islay standards. So is there any barley farming in Oregon or the subregion?

11 years ago 0