Ardbeg 10 Year Old
It's Ardbeg, Jim but . . .
7 488
Review by @RianC
- Nose~
- Taste~
- Finish~
- Balance~
- Overall88
Show rating data charts
Distribution of ratings for this:
My first Connosr review was an Ardbeg 10 over a year ago now - how time flies! I've made it no secret I'm a big Ardbeg fan and make it a norm to have at least one bottle of the ten a year. So how is this one holding up then?
Review is from a double pour, neat but sat for ten minutes or so. Bottle has been open a few weeks with about a third gone.
Nose - Classic Ardbeg . . . which is, for me, TCP, some brine, smoke, chocolate lime sweets and quite a creamy vanilla malt note with this bottle. More rounded and less of a peaty punch than other bottles (but I am being overly pedantic; through over familiarity, perhaps?). Still good though, and clean.
Taste - Lime sour at first then it develops into creamy vanilla with some distinct barley notes (which is unusual). A little thin on the mouthfeel it has to be said as well. Oh and liquorice(y) peat, of course.
Finish - Medium-long. There's a lingering of the lime sourness, peat tang and the familiar bellowing upsurge of smoke is, well, kind of there, but it's also a little less prominent than other bottles I've had. More of a waft than a bellow. Some pleasantly bitter tannins.
This is still clearly a bottle of Ardbeg 10 but it's definitely a little different than other bottles I've had. It's as if the neat pour gives what other bottles did after I'd added water; which, by the way, does not help this at all - it loses any peat 'hit' and becomes too watery. This is better, for me, after a non peaty whisky as it emphasises the kind of notes that I'm after here. It's still very good but perhaps not quite stellar or going supernova.
Find where to buy Ardbeg whisky
Well, from what I hear, the Supernova is no longer being produced, the last release being 2014 I think.
You make me want to open my 10, and my Corryvreckin, and have a vertical tasting with Oogy...