Gordon and MacPhail Linkwood 15 YO
Nozinan Mini and Sample Series - 81
4 285
Review by @Nozinan
- Nose~
- Taste~
- Finish~
- Balance~
- Overall85
Show rating data charts
Distribution of ratings for this:
I don’t have a lot of experience with Linkwood. A few years ago I bought a Cadenhead’s CS release on the recommendation of @bluenote. It is delicious (I even bought a spare), but I haven’t gotten around to reviewing it yet.
Recently @fiddich1980 send a few of us some samples of components he used to create a blend resembling JW Green. We sampled the blend and some of the parts just over a week ago. This was one of them. I don’t know much about the bottling except that it is 15 years old and bottled at 46%.
This expression is reviewed in my usual manner, in a Highland whisky glass, allowing it to settle after which I take my nosing and tasting notes, followed by the addition of a few drops of water, waiting, then nosing and tasting.
Nose: 22/25
Fruity on the nose. Fruit punch. Fresh. Sweet but not cloyingly so. I get a touch of graininess, a touch of baking spice. Very pleasant nose. No significant change with water.
Taste: 21/25
Sweet on the arrival. Slightly spirity. Spicy. Bright fruits. A little effervescent in the development. Slightly thinner with water and I almost feel like I get a hint of peat, but it could be my imagination.
Finish: 21/25
Bitter on the finish, fairly long. Some pepper.
Balance: 21/25
Fairly balanced. Not as complex as I might expect from a middle-aged whisky.
Score: 85/100
This is a solid malt, presented in a solid manner. It’s probably not something I would want in my (currently overflowing) cabinet but certainly something I would accept if offered a dram.
Thank you @fiddich1980 for giving me the chance to get to know this whisky.
Find where to buy Linkwood whisky
@Nozinan I wish I'd bought 2 of that Cadenhead CS Linkwood. That was a flat out winner. As for the G&M 15 year old, It's very nice in a non complex way but I was a bit disappointed that it was not substantially better than the original 43% version which I thought was very good. I'm in complete agreement with your review, and 85, maybe 86 is where I would put it. I would have scored the earlier version about the same.