Whisky Connosr
Menu
Buy Whisky Online

Laphroaig Quarter Cask

Have some more oak with your oak

0 582

RReview by @Rigmorole

13th Aug 2013

0

Laphroaig Quarter Cask
  • Nose
    ~
  • Taste
    ~
  • Finish
    ~
  • Balance
    ~
  • Overall
    82

Show rating data charts

Distribution of ratings for this: brand user

Nose: Oak, dried fruit essence, and a pleasing nuttiness. The nose is quite enjoyable on this scotch.

Palate: bitter oak dominates with some hot chillis, while the background is occupied by toasted barley grains. There is also a presence of cola and cream soda lurking in the background. to me, the palate disappoints.

Finish: Medium length with more bitter oak, leathery aged cigar wrapper, dried cherries, and prunes.

How does this one compare to the Laphroaig 10, the Cask Strength 10,and the 18? Not well, I'm afraid, and I know a lot of very reputable and experienced whisky connosrs will disagree with me. However, be this as it may, I am posting my review for the record: I feel that QC is over-rated as a scotch and this fad with pass with time, which tends to even out the kinks, so to speak. To me, QC simply does not have a favorable balance due to bitter oaky domination in the mouth.

Do I even like it the QC? Honestly, no. And I seem to like it even worse than I did six months ago.

Do I like the other Laphroaig offerings? Yes, I do and I always have, especially the cask strength batches. I am quite partial to them, and I also appreciate the understated charm of the 18.

I do not always opt for youthful bombast over sophistication, even in a heavily peated Islay whisky. For example, I prefer the PC8 over the PC7. With Ardbegs, I'll take the Uigeadale over the Alligator or the Corryvreckan any eve of the week.

As for Laphroaig, the 18 is a nice dram indeed, despite the fact that, for the money, I am a "cask strength" man.

Cask strength 10 also blends quite well with Glenfarclas 12 year for a charming vatting that visiting company in one's home will often enjoy.

In Oregon, the Glenfarclas 12 is one of the best buys on the shelves these days at $41 a bottle when Highland Park 12 is up around $49 now. Is eight dollars a make or break factor? No, certainly not, and the Highland Park also vats up nicely with half one half to one quarter of Laphroaig Cask Strength. I really am partial to the CS 10 Batch 003.

Related Laphroaig reviews

5 comments

Rigmorole commented

Sorry, when I say "one half" I mean 2 parts GF12 and 1 part CS and when I say "one quarter" I mean 3 parts GF12 and 1 part CS.

11 years ago 0

Rigmorole commented

p.s. I did not see the review of QC right under mine when I wrote this review. I was not trying to react to it at all. I had planned to write this review yesterday

11 years ago 0

@wtrstrnghlt
wtrstrnghlt commented

I think I agree with you when it comes to the 10y vs QC. The 10y gave me more pleasure than the QC.

I have a closed bottle of the 18y, but I'm not planning on opening it soon.

What is your experience with the different batches of the CS? Is it the 10y on steroids? Is the a quality difference between batch 1, 2 or 3?

11 years ago 0

@GotOak91
GotOak91 commented

I've never seen consecutive reviews of a single bottle of anything on here. What a coincidence! An excellent and understandable review. BTW that vatting sounds delicious.

11 years ago 0

masterj commented

I agree. To me though,regular 10y.o. Laphroaig and QC have a similar taste profile and the malts struggle to balance out on your palate. For some odd reason with cask strength and 18 the balance is just perfect. No glaring singular flavor profile, nothing overbearing, just a good deliver with what the whisky has to offer.

11 years ago 0