Macallan Rare Cask
Another Rare Whisky
0 185
Review by @MaltActivist
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1c7a/e1c7a69539e68e4fd7e8b8bfde3d1bbaca5101e6" alt="Macallan Rare Cask"
- Nose22
- Taste21
- Finish21
- Balance21
- Overall85
Show rating data charts
Distribution of ratings for this:
OK so let's give credit where credit is due. When Macallan do something they do it in style. Have to give them props for that. And they seemed to have pulled out all the stops for the launch of their newest NAS, the Rare Cask.
Set on the 27th floor of the Burj Al Arab Hotel, in Dubai, is the newly opened bar Gold On 27, which I'm sure you've figured out by the name, is pretty lavishly done up in gold. This was to serve as the venue for this rather glitzy affair headlined by the Edrington Group Creative Director Mr Ken Grier.
I managed to sneak five minutes with him during the course of the evening and found Ken to be an instantly likeable chap. And looking at how Macallan is being perceived today in the world I'm confident he's doing a stellar job.
Which now brings me to, what I consider, a serious problem in the world of whisky today. Stellar marketing to push average products to wide-eyed consumers. Now I'm in marketing as well and have, at times, been guilty of doing the same.
It is, after all, the look that sells. I get it.
But whisky evokes certain emotions that few other products do. It's constantly being judged across an enormous gamut of subjectiveness. And each opinion is a sum of so many influences.
Which brings me to the moral dilemma I've started to face of late. Is something so subjective really bad (or good) just because I like it (or hate it)? I honestly don't have the answer to that.
Take Dalmore for example. I think Richard Paterson is one of the best marketers of his era. Taking, what I feel is, a mediocre product at best and doing a fantastic job positioning it as an ultra-premium brand. I may not like that whisky but I have seasoned whisky buddies who swear by it. Are they wrong? Am I? Again, I don't know.
So I feel that this Rare Cask is treading that ever shrinking line between being genuinely good and being wonderfully marketed. Do I think the whisky is good? Sure, it's not bad. It's not the magical elixir made from the tears of a thousand angels, mind you, but it's certainly drinkable.
Is it over-compensating by being packaged in a lovely bottle and experienced at the world's most prestigious venue? I certainly think so. Is Bob Dalgarno, their esteemed Whisky Maker, under constant pressure to churn out premium expression after expression despite depleting stocks of well aged whiskies just to satisfy both the Marketing and Finance department? You bet he is.
OK. I think that's enough for now. Let me just tell you what I think of the whisky. My views aren't shared by many but that's fine.
Made from a selection of casks which the official literature liberally describes as being rare, exquisite, never before, never again or exclusive (among other buzz words) and employing a mix of first-fill sherry and bourbon barrels (not all, mind you) my sample is from a brand new bottle and served at 43%
Honey. Vanilla. Grated ginger. Nutmeg. Strong Oloroso sherry. Almonds. Touch of oak. Hint of citrus. Cloves. Red grapes. Green apples. A fair amount of spiciness. There is some masala - the nice kind. Dark chocolate. I like the nose. There's absolutely nothing wrong with it. It doesn't blow me away but that's fine. I don't think it was meant to. 22/25
Medium bodied. A little oily. Plums. Raisins. Those Christmas spices again. Cinnamon. Nutmeg. Clove. Chocolate. Dark oranges. Christmas cake or fudge. Almonds. Toasted tobacco. It's not as good as the nose. I would have preferred a more full bodied approach. 21/25
Medium. Quite oily. Cinnamon. Bitter chocolate. Could I have done with a bit more? Sure. 21/25
I was sat with Ken Grier when tasting this so I might be a little biased by his good natured attention towards me as we shared this dram. Forgive me, I'm human after all. Otherwise the tasting camp was divided down the middle. Haters and lovers. Unsurprisingly the haters were part of my whisky club. The lovers people I had just met who were out enjoying an evening of decadent whisky tasting. Which sort of amplifies my point of how insanely subjective this matter is. I think the world would be a better place if the snobs chilled out a bit and the casual drinkers gave their whiskies a little more attention instead.
PS I would also like to ride a pink unicorn that pees only The Macallan 1946.
Find where to buy Macallan whisky
Correction : there are no bourbon barrels in this whisky. Just American & European Sherry. Of which some are first-fills.